Search

Jack Merz

Portland, OR
3.0S year-end 2025
12 matches · 7W–5L · seasons 20262026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
22%
stay 3.0
78%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 67% stay · 33% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
56 of 357
OR · 3.0
92 of 600

Jack is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history12 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Merz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Bradley
+0.027about as expected — took 35% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-31 · MAC-Ticzon/Merz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Gnich
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Chris Martell
2026-05-23 · MAC-Ticzon/Merz · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.029below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · MAC-Ticzon/Merz · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.070better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · MAC-Ticzon/Merz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Schulman
+0.012about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
John Kim
2026-05-02 · MAC-Ticzon/Merz · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.041better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Keaton Partch
2026-04-04 · MAC-Ticzon/Merz · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.071better than expected — took 75% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-03-08 · MAC-Ticzon · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Phillip Jones
+0.074better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0
W
Bo Jacober
2026-02-22 · MAC-Ticzon · #1 Male Singles · 6.0
+0.054better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3
L
Jessica Li / Yifan Xiang
2026-01-30 · MAC-Ticzon · #1 Mixed Doubles · 6.0 · with Anna Catibayan
+0.034better than expected — took 45% of games against 34% expected
6-5
L
2026-01-16 · MAC-Ticzon · #1 Mixed Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Goetz
0.096below expectation — took 14% of games against 61% expected
6-1
W
Zi Wang / Hanmin Wang
2026-01-03 · MAC-Ticzon · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with John Jack Magaddino
+0.059better than expected — took 60% of games against 37% expected
6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.