Search

Jeremy Harkin

RIDGEFIELD, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
91 matches · 46W–45L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 9% stay · 91% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Lower than today’s 3.25 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
14 of 755

Jeremy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeremy has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jeremy has gone from the 45th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 66.1% of games
3.0
50%
18W–18L · 53% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
37.9%
11W–18L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-07-26 · VTC-Won · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nenette Olson
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Alejandra Reyes / Kelley Strawnmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jessica Watson
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Mark Nash / Amber Whitemixed
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Hall
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Christine Heyen / Erik Jensenmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Hall
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Kara Dokos / Charles Clinemixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Hall
+0.000below expectation — took 58% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
William Allers / Andrea Duranballenmixed
2026-07-12 · VTC-Won · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yumiko Pike
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 65% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Nicole Kennely / Danny Petermixed
2026-07-05 · Bend-Shank You Very Much · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-03 · VTC-Won · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nenette Olson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Scott Thomas / Bridghid McMonaglemixed
2026-06-21 · Bend-Shank You Very Much · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · MJ2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Ramshaw
0.011about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · CGM-Szueber/Thoreson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chuck Lantz
0.023below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · CGM-Szueber/Thoreson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Thoreson
+0.053better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.