Teams

IRV-Walker/Laurent

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lisa Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Brooke Kuerbis
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Char Riley
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.23
Julia Plowman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kelly Norling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Traci Laurent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Renee Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Blythe Knott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Lucia Parker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Nozomi Bray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Lisa Lyon
91W–68L career
0%99%0%
3.77
3.5
Brooke Kuerbis
93W–31L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Char Riley
37W–47L career
1%98%1%
3.27
3.5
Julia Plowman
73W–28L career
4%95%1%
3.23
3.5
Kelly Norling
68W–45L career
2%98%0%
3.22
3.5
Traci Laurent
46W–54L career
4%96%0%
3.20
3.5
Renee Schwartz
23W–21L career
5%95%0%
3.19
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3.5
Blythe Knott
22W–48L career
13%87%0%
3.12
3
Lucia Parker
50W–35L career
0%59%41%
3.08
3
Nozomi Bray
60W–110L career
0%97%3%
2.88

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.