Search

Blake Simonsen

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
80 matches · 44W–36L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 3.0
97%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
310 of 399
OR · 3.5
587 of 735

Blake is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Blake has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Blake has gone from the 42nd to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 58.6% of games
3.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Keomanivanh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isaac Goshay
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · LOTC-Keomanivanh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Calvy Yue
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Joel Mercier / Zi Wang
2026-04-25 · LOTC-Keomanivanh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Wirth
+0.007better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-05 · LOTC-Keomanivanh · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Wirth
+0.040better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Tse
+0.007about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-03-14 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Sager
+0.028better than expected — took 100% of games against 72% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Piero Fenato / Gerard Mildner
2026-02-07 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Archer
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-01 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Archer
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Matt Ramshaw / George Apostolou
2026-01-11 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Tse
0.044below expectation — took 47% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-07 · PTC-Wagner/Simonsen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Audrey Weil
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-21 · PTC-Wagner/Nguyen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anna Simonsen
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-11-01 · PTC-Wagner/Simonsen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Shier
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.