← Search

Dan Bingham

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 46W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dan Bingham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2025-09-27 · SHC-Lomax · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Christensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-13 · SHC-Lomax · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mimi Romano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-06-07 · SHC-Lumetta · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Hlady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-01 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-04 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-03-22 · #2 Doubles · with Sam Lumetta championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-21 · #3 Doubles · with Craig Hlady championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-01-12 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Wendling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-01-04 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John van Leeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2024-06-14 · SHC-Gettle/Van Leeuwen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Pacioni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-01 · SHC-Gettle/Van Leeuwen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Tatsumi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-26 · SHC-Gettle/Van Leeuwen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul OHollaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
52.3%
23W–21L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams