← Search

Gram Leahy

Portland, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
94 matches · 59W–35L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Gram sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Gram is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gram has been 5.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Gram has gone from the 65th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 59.4% of games
5.0
66.7%
36W–18L · 54.7% of games
10.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.2% of games
9.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with AJ Avansino
−0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Scott Erickson / Nick Buckleychamps
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Sergio Toledo
+0.055better than expected — took 55% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Joshua Bradshaw / Marc Ollivierchamps
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Martin Bats
−0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Brenden Barrows / Ryan Chin
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Martin Bats
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 4-2
W
Christopher Evola / Andrew Kells
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Andrew Nakajima
+0.023better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with John Closi
−0.175about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Alexander Calpagiu / Mark Chen
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carlos Donat
−0.067below expectation — took 60% of games against 81% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Marcus Eyth / Brenden Barrows
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Martin Bats
+0.032better than expected — took 58% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Rayden Murata / Koby Murata
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carlos Donat
+0.055better than expected — took 65% of games against 40% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
James Luu / Mark Taylor
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eric Pickard
−0.052below expectation — took 43% of games against 63% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · #1 Singles · 5.0
−0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Morgan McIntosh
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.