Teams

NOR-MAC-Leahy

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.92 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-13vs THPRD-Rankin 5.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesKRISTIAN PEEV / Paul Reber vs Gordon Barrows / Pannhara Mam2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesReif Larsen vs Mitchell Earle6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMartin Bats / Gram Leahy vs Brenden Barrows / Ryan Chin6-3, 4-2
2026-06-06vs VTC-NelsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMartin Bats / Paul Reber vs Richard Sabo / Alexander Calpagiu4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesReif Larsen / Connor Leahy vs Elijah Nelson / Simon Collis6-0, 6-2
2026-05-23vs VTC-NelsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarlos Donat / Gram Leahy vs Alexander Calpagiu / Mark Chen6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKRISTIAN PEEV vs Andy Stecher7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEric Pickard / Sergio Toledo vs Elijah Nelson / Atom Fjeldsted3-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs THPRD-Rankin 5.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesConnor Leahy / Reif Larsen vs Peter Yellico / Christopher Evola6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKRISTIAN PEEV vs Gordon Barrows6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGram Leahy / Martin Bats vs Marcus Eyth / Brenden Barrows4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-08vs PT&E/SJRC-TruongWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarlos Donat / Gram Leahy vs Rayden Murata / Koby Murata6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRuben Zrihen vs Daniel Park1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesConnor Leahy / KRISTIAN PEEV vs Bao Bui / Franklin Truong6-1, 6-0
2026-04-25vs NOR-LCC-SchweitzLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarlos Donat / Martin Bats vs Shouta Fukamachi / Nick Buckley6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKRISTIAN PEEV vs Kihiro Karasawa3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnor Leahy / Sergio Toledo vs Lew de Leon / Dyllan Fitzgerald2-6, 4-6
2026-04-11vs CAC-McGarity 5.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarlos Donat / Paul Reber vs Seth Lee / Bill Terry6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKRISTIAN PEEV vs Richard Shugar6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGram Leahy / Eric Pickard vs James Luu / Mark Taylor7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-03vs SHC-GoldsmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesRuben Zrihen / Carlos Donat vs John Closi / Chris Lilley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGram Leahy vs William Leach0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEric Pickard / Connor Leahy vs Ryan Goldsmith / Tim Layman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Carlos Donat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.85
Martin Bats
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.85
KRISTIAN PEEV
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.83
Paul Reber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.81
Reif Larsen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.77
Connor Leahy
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.58
Ruben Zrihen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.56
Gram Leahy
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 5
4.48
Eric Pickard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.44
Sergio Toledo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4.5
James Page
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Pickard + Gram Leahy3547% games−0.7% vs expected
Connor Leahy + Gram Leahy14658% games−1.1% vs expected
Carlos Donat + Gram Leahy5159% games−1.3% vs expected
Eric Pickard + Connor Leahy4158% games−1.4% vs expected
Carlos Donat + Paul Reber314 matchesnot enough data
Connor Leahy + Paul Reber314 matchesnot enough data
Eric Pickard + Paul Reber303 matchesnot enough data
KRISTIAN PEEV + Connor Leahy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carlos Donat
20W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.93
Martin Bats
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.85
KRISTIAN PEEV
13W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.85
5
Paul Reber
33W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.83
Reif Larsen
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Connor Leahy
55W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
Ruben Zrihen
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Gram Leahy
62W–36L career · 9 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.56
5
Eric Pickard
28W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.48
4.5
Sergio Toledo
69W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
James Page
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.