Search

Nick Buckley

Beaverton, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
30 matches · 15W–15L · seasons 20192026
Where Nick sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Nick is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams24 teams · 2013–2026
NOR-LCC-Schweitz
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men
2026
N OR-LOTC-Taylor
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2026
WHRC-Edwards
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men
2025
WHRC-Dusicka
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men
2024
N OR-VTC-Schweitz
2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2023
MPRC-Pritchard
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nick has been 5.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.0201920202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Nick has gone from the 74th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
5.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 51.8% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-06-21 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #2 Doubles · with Scott Erickson
0.055below expectation — took 45% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Carlos Donat / Martin Bats
2026-04-25 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Shouta Fukamachi
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Chris Lilley / John Closi
2026-04-11 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Adrien Leemin
+0.044better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-12-14 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #3 Doubles · with Ellen Mader
+0.019better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · N OR-LOTC-Taylor · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Mader
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Steve Fogg / Michelle Lymixed
2025-11-09 · N OR-LOTC-Taylor · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lindsey Kahler
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-25 · N OR-LOTC-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Mader
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · N OR-LOTC-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Mader
+0.000about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Andrew Nakajima / Jasper Koenen
2025-06-22 · WHRC-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Arthur Karas
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Shouta Fukamachi / Phalkun Mam
2025-06-08 · WHRC-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexander Canellopoulos
0.011about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Joe Brooks / Bill Terry
2025-06-01 · WHRC-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexander Canellopoulos
+0.068better than expected — took 80% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Phalkun Mam / Andrew Kells
2025-05-10 · WHRC-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with WILLIAM EDWARDS
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.