Search

Steve Fogg

West Linn, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
151 matches · 84W–67L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 4.0
99%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
West Linn · 4.5
2 of 12
OR · 4.5
50 of 226

Steve is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams48 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Steve has been 4.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Steve has gone from the 72nd to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
50%
25W–25L · 50.5% of games
8.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.2% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 60.8% of games
9.0mixed
43.9%
18W–23L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history151 matches
W
Tim Qualls / Tom Timpermanchamps
2026-06-26 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · with Daniel Heck
+0.026better than expected — took 55% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Monson
0.039below expectation — took 40% of games against 57% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Brent Grubb / Pat Soong
2026-04-19 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Monson
0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-15 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Wilcox
+0.010about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Wilcox
+0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Pat Soong / Jeb Hubbs
2026-03-08 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Eliason
0.014below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Eliason
0.052below expectation — took 59% of games against 75% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Kevin Vedder / Deepak Kumar
2026-01-31 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Eliason
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Brian Board / Mike Vuong
2026-01-05 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Wilcox
+0.037better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-29 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pierre Burthey
0.025about as expected — took 68% of games against 71% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pierre Burthey
0.039below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-11-09 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michelle Ly
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.