← Search

Steve Fogg

West Linn, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 84W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Fogg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Daniel Heck championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Monson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Monson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-15 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-06 · SHC-Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-01-31 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-05 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-29 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pierre Burthey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pierre Burthey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-09 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michelle Ly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
50%
25W–25L · 50.5% of games
8.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.2% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 60.8% of games
9.0mixed
43.9%
18W–23L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal