Teams

CRRC-Johnson/Newcomb

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Mary Bullard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Callen Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.98
Mitchell Earle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 0
3.92
Leigh Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Leslie Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Nick Hooker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Brandon Shell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Howard Jaffe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Wendi Ouellette
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.50
Brad Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.30
Trina Newcomb
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Amy Bucher
178W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
4.5
Mary Bullard
117W–61L career
11%89%0%
4.02
4
Callen Sterling
71W–23L career
0%81%19%
4.00
0
Mitchell Earle
15W–14L career
20%80%0%
3.98
4
Leigh Anderson
54W–22L career
0%93%7%
3.92
4
Leslie Lynch
58W–58L career
0%96%3%
3.87
4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.83
4
Brandon Shell
42W–33L career
9%91%0%
3.62
4
Howard Jaffe
23W–29L career · type S
19%81%0%
3.60
4
Wendi Ouellette
177W–49L career
16%84%0%
3.57
3.5
Brad Johnson
193W–102L career
0%83%17%
3.50
3.5
Trina Newcomb
78W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.