Teams

THPRD-Shull

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.9 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Tony Wang
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Damon Ogden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Justin Shull
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Van Khieu
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.70
Zach Butler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
James Horen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
PHAT Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Neil Soiffer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Trong Tong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Suresh Chand
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Tony Wang
14W–14L career
6%87%8%
3.79
4
Damon Ogden
86W–83L career
1%99%0%
3.75
4
Justin Shull
133W–38L career
1%99%0%
3.73
4
Van Khieu
99W–48L career
1%99%0%
3.70
4
Zach Butler
9W–9L career
5%94%0%
3.70
4
James Horen
99W–69L career
16%84%0%
3.56
4
PHAT Lee
44W–33L career
29%71%0%
3.54
4
Neil Soiffer
96W–138L career
44%56%0%
3.46
3.5
Trong Tong
27W–17L career
0%91%9%
3.43
3.5
Suresh Chand
79W–32L career
0%94%6%
3.41

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.