WHRC-Mehlhorn

2026 Adult 70 & Over · 70 & Over Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.32 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65

Alan Lave

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.56

James Horen

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.33

Greg van Gasse

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

—

Tom Stacy

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.14

David Ritchie

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.06

Mitchell Todd

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.94

Mark Becker

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.90

Thomas Mehlhorn

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.77

Randolph Splitter

published 3

2.73

Dave Ramm

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.70

William Pettis

published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Alan Lave

19W–22L career

8%92%0%

3.65

James Horen

99W–69L career

16%84%0%

3.56

3.5

Greg van Gasse

8W–22L career

1%94%5%

3.33

3.5

Tom Stacy

3W–7L career

not enough data

—

3.5

David Ritchie

11W–26L career

9%91%0%

3.14

Mitchell Todd

42W–39L career

0%65%35%

3.06

Mark Becker

15W–33L career · type A

0%87%13%

2.94

Thomas Mehlhorn

14W–15L career

0%92%8%

2.90

Randolph Splitter

7W–30L career

7%87%6%

2.77

Dave Ramm

3W–9L career · type S

3%96%1%

2.73

William Pettis

14W–17L career

6%93%1%

2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.