← Search

Ahmad Garakani

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 47W–39L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Ahmad Garakani to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2025-06-22 · WHRC-Heller/Pham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-06-21 · WHRC-Heller/Pham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-25 · WHRC-Lave · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-18 · WHRC-Lave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Lave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-04-17 · WHRC-Lave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Lave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-04-12 · WHRC-Heller/Pham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joerg Droste
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-04-11 · WHRC-Lave · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-03 · WHRC-Lave · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-5
W
2025-03-09 · WHRC-Heller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-08 · WHRC-Heller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-02-22 · WHRC-Heller · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stefan Olander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-02-01 · WHRC-Heller · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Stutzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2005–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.2% of games
8.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 54.6% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 45% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams