Search

Ahmad Garakani

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
86 matches · 47W–39L · seasons 20192025
Where Ahmad sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Ahmad is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams75 teams · 2005–2026
2027 Credits
Credit Holds · NO
2026
WHRC-Heller/Pham
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
WHRC-Heller
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
WHRC-Moreno 8.0
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
WHRC-Lave
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
WHRC-Heller
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ahmad has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ahmad has gone from the 64th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.2% of games
8.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 54.6% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 45% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history86 matches
W
Sanh Trinh / De Xiang Novac-Yu
2025-06-22 · WHRC-Heller/Pham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Albrecht
+0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-06-21 · WHRC-Heller/Pham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Albrecht
+0.012about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-25 · WHRC-Lave · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Knudsen
0.045below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-18 · WHRC-Lave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Lave
+0.038better than expected — took 68% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-04-17 · WHRC-Lave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Lave
0.003about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Frank Mathews / Michael Rewers
2025-04-12 · WHRC-Heller/Pham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joerg Droste
+0.040better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-04-11 · WHRC-Lave · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Knudsen
0.046below expectation — took 33% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-04-03 · WHRC-Lave · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Knudsen
0.004about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-5
W
2025-03-09 · WHRC-Heller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
0.019below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-08 · WHRC-Heller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Pham
+0.017better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Ramon Delapaz / Anthony Valenzuela
2025-02-22 · WHRC-Heller · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stefan Olander
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-02-01 · WHRC-Heller · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Stutzman
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.