← Teams

WHRC-Lave

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.78 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Ahmad Garakani
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Douglas Knudsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Richard Crossley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Alan Lave
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.54
James Horen
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.42
Matt Thayer
published 3.5
3.32
Frank Foti
published 3.5
3.30
Bill Lowblad
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Tom Stacy
published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-08Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJames Horen / Alan Lave vs Russ DeMoss / Mark Stephenson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Lowblad / Sam Aiello vs Kelly Robertson / John McCroskey6-4, 7-6
2025-05-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAlan Lave / Douglas Knudsen vs Steve Bolstad / Robert Fowler6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBill Lowblad / Sam Aiello vs Eric Cooley / Bill Rhoades6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJames Horen / Paul Stutzman vs Tim Brink / Jack Schunk7-5, 6-3
2025-04-25Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDouglas Knudsen / Ahmad Garakani vs John McCroskey / Clark Cosart6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSam Aiello / Bill Lowblad vs Russ DeMoss / Matthew Trank6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlan Lave / Tom Stacy vs Arthur Edwards / Paul Garry6-4, 6-3
2025-04-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRichard Crossley / Douglas Knudsen vs Bill Henderson / Brian Posewitz1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAhmad Garakani / Alan Lave vs Donald Brenneman / Jeffrey Krum6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJames Horen / Paul Stutzman vs Jonathan Barg / Mark Stromme6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDouglas Knudsen / Richard Crossley vs Scott Eliason / Robert Ferek6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAhmad Garakani / Alan Lave vs Roger Mickey / Frank Olson6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Horen / Tom Stacy vs Neil Soiffer / Truc Ly6-2, 7-5
2025-04-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAhmad Garakani / Douglas Knudsen vs Robert Ferek / Scott Eliason6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJohn Leach / Bill Lowblad vs Frank Olson / Kelly Small6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJames Horen / Paul Stutzman vs Neil Soiffer / Bruce Yang7-5, 6-1
2025-04-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAhmad Garakani / Douglas Knudsen vs Jack Henry / Bill Henderson7-6, 6-5
L#2 DoublesBill Lowblad / John Leach vs Peter McKittrick / Jeffrey Krum7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTom Stacy / Alan Lave vs Richard Keller Ii / John Popplewell6-0, 6-2
2025-03-27Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDouglas Knudsen / Alan Lave vs Steve Bolstad / Jack Schunk7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJames Horen / Paul Stutzman vs Bill Rhoades / Carlin Jackson6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBill Lowblad / Sam Aiello vs Floyd Grant / Tom Lonergan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Ahmad Garakani
47W–39L career
not enough data
—
4
Douglas Knudsen
5W–9L career
4%95%1%
3.74
4
Richard Crossley
66W–67L career
6%94%0%
3.66
4
Alan Lave
20W–23L career
10%90%0%
3.62
4
James Horen
100W–70L career
21%79%0%
3.54
3.5
Matt Thayer
91W–63L career
0%94%6%
3.42
3.5
Frank Foti
20W–21L career
3%90%7%
3.32
3.5
Bill Lowblad
92W–61L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
Tom Stacy
3W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.