Search

Bob Lehman

Gresham, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
93 matches · 27W–66L · seasons 20192025
Where Bob sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Bob is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams57 teams · 2004–2025
CAC-Lewis/Christiaan
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
CAC-Ferek
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
CAC-Deems
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2023
CAC-Lee
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
CAC-Binns
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
CAC-Binns
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Bob has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Bob has gone from the 5th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
25.6%
11W–32L · 40.6% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.3% of games
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 47.4% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 50.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
L
Bradley Martin / Jeffrey Truong
2025-04-27 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Konner Shim
0.104below expectation — took 0% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Antony Kamenny / Jeffrey Truong
2025-03-30 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juan Arenas
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Deepak Kumar / Neal Burgstahler
2025-03-15 · CAC-Ferek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Luangrath
0.083below expectation — took 8% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-02-01 · CAC-Ferek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Yang
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-03-18 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Robertson
0.031below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-03-12 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Robertson
+0.030better than expected — took 58% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Robert Meyer / Mark Meyer
2023-03-04 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Robertson
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Richard Clark / Kevin Sullivan
2023-02-26 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harlan Silverman
0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-02-10 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Shaw
0.014below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-01-15 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harlan Silverman
+0.046better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-01-07 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harlan Silverman
+0.015better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-12-04 · CAC-Deems · #1 Doubles · with Allen VanLeuven
0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.