← Teams

CAC-Binns

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Josh Meyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
—
Bob Lehman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Christopher Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
—
Quyen Wong
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Michael Stone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Anthony Guzzi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Ben Yamaguchi
published 3
2.71
Allen VanLeuven
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Michael Stone vs Kirt Eftekhar / Robert Broad7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJosh Meyer vs Seth Yount6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Shaw / Rick Davis vs Dan Wolff / Jeff Anhaltzer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-05Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesQuyen Wong / Christopher Shaw vs Willis Boyer / Bruce Robertson5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJosh Meyer vs Paul Laurent6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Michael Stone vs Jonathan Steinhoff / Jeff Streich6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBob Lehman / Rick Davis vs Scott Beall / Jeff Littlejohn6-4, 6-4
2022-05-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBob Lehman / Christopher Shaw vs David Lee / Daniel M Kim6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAllen VanLeuven / Anthony Guzzi vs Jungyoon Kim / JIN PARK6-2, 6-1
2022-05-15Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesChristopher Shaw / Allen VanLeuven vs Thor Deacon / Richard Jennings6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRick Davis / Anthony Guzzi vs Todd Khozein / Richard Press6-3, 6-4
2022-05-08Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesBob Lehman / Michael Stone vs Wes Haas / Mark Bernazzani6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJosh Meyer vs Saril Valiyaparambil5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Shaw / Martin Jeffrey Binns vs Evan Cohn / Stefano Cavallucci6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBen Yamaguchi / Allen VanLeuven vs Sebastian Llados Vila / Jeff Ruby2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Christopher Shaw vs Stephen Marsh / Srinivasa Kanamatha6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJosh Meyer vs Arjun Bilakanti6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBob Lehman / Michael Stone vs Sid Ramachandran / Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal7-5, 6-1
2022-04-17Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Michael Stone vs Michael Lee / Shane Kim6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesQuyen Wong vs Julian Pscheid6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBob Lehman / Allen VanLeuven vs Charlie Adams / Raimund Grube6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Guzzi / Ben Yamaguchi vs Matthew Casimo / James Thomas6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-09Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesMichael Stone / Allen VanLeuven vs Ron Selis / Jonathan Steinhoff6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesQuyen Wong vs Rob Chandler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Christopher Shaw vs Paul Laurent / Christopher Kayser6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBen Yamaguchi / Anthony Guzzi vs Scott Beall / Jeff Littlejohn6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Josh Meyer
33W–15L career
10%90%0%
3.64
3.5
Bob Lehman
27W–66L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Christopher Shaw
65W–55L career
5%93%2%
3.25
3.5
Quyen Wong
32W–29L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michael Stone
26W–44L career
3%96%1%
3.24
3
Anthony Guzzi
20W–54L career · type S
not enough data
—
3
Ben Yamaguchi
16W–16L career · type M
not enough data
—
3
Allen VanLeuven
35W–57L career
9%89%2%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.