← Teams

CAC-Lee

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.43 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Vincent Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Min Lee
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
—
Bob Lehman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Michael Stone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Hoon Shin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.73
Victor Regner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Allen VanLeuven
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-09-22Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesVictor Regner / STEPHEN BRUGH vs Chris Wickham / David Earl7-5, 6-0
2022-11-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Vincent Robertson vs Brady Berry / Craig Frasier7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMin Lee / Hoon Shin vs David Williams / John Bergin6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVictor Regner / Dave Kuhns vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-22Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAllen VanLeuven / Victor Regner vs Hayward Reed / Jon Peters6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVincent Robertson / Martin Jeffrey Binns vs Augustin Belindean / John Wallin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMin Lee / Dave Kuhns vs Rolf Ellingsen / John Hapke4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Vincent Robertson vs Doyoung Moon / JIN PARK4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Stone / Allen VanLeuven vs Chinwoo Kim / Von Kim6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMin Lee / Hoon Shin vs James Yang / Seung Pak4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Michael Stone vs Brian Cormier / Jeff Gonzales2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBob Lehman / Allen VanLeuven vs Aaron Bowman / Jerry Garland6-4, 3-4
W#3 DoublesDave Kuhns / Victor Regner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-07Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Michael Stone vs Matt Curtis / Bill Henderson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBob Lehman / Allen VanLeuven vs Matthew Casimo / Lawrence Reichman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMin Lee / Victor Regner vs Steven Christenson / Mark Hudspeth6-4, 7-6
2022-10-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesHoon Shin / Min Lee vs Simon Lofts / Stanley Mo7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Vincent Robertson vs Richard Jennings / Patrick Kirk6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBob Lehman / Allen VanLeuven vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-25Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBob Lehman / Vincent Robertson vs Scott Mayer / Randy Nicholson7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMin Lee / Dave Kuhns vs Mike Baker / Eric Anderson6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAllen VanLeuven / Michael Stone vs Brad Socolofsky / Sam Lumetta6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Vincent Robertson
10W–23L career
0%59%41%
3.56
4
Min Lee
46W–41L career
56%44%0%
3.42
3.5
Bob Lehman
27W–66L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michael Stone
26W–44L career
3%96%1%
3.24
3.5
Hoon Shin
112W–53L career
13%87%0%
3.13
3
Victor Regner
11W–24L career
6%92%2%
2.73
3
Allen VanLeuven
35W–57L career
9%89%2%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.