← Search

Dirk Jacobs

Forest Grove, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 53W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dirk Jacobs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-02-28 · MAC-Meyer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · MAC-Meyer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · MAC-Meyer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-14 · MAC-Wehner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Wolverton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-07 · MAC-Wehner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fenn Bourland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · MAC-Wehner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-06 · MAC-Wehner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Eisen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-22 · MAC-Kitzis/Eisen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-01 · MAC-Kitzis/Eisen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Eisen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-01-12 · MAC-Kitzis/Eisen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-03 · MAC-Kitzis/Eisen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2024-11-16 · N OR-THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Chenoweth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70%
14W–6L · 56.3% of games
3.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 48.4% of games
6.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.9% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams