Search

Joel Greenblum

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
16 matches · 8W–8L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
25 of 52
OR · 3.0
316 of 600

Joel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams10 teams · 2017–2026
IRV-LaMontagne
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2026
IRV-Lewis/Kuerbis
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
IRV-LaMontagne
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
IRV-Townsend
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
N OR-IRV-Martinez
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2023
N OR-IRV-Martinez
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joel has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 52% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history16 matches
L
2025-11-15 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doug Cooke
+0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-11-02 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ken Naffziger
+0.027better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-04 · IRV-LaMontagne · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rich Brown
+0.056better than expected — took 92% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-05-28 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin McMullen
0.041below expectation — took 46% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-6
W
Dongseok Shin / Hyung Seok Kim
2023-04-22 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tate Kuerbis
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-04-02 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #1 Doubles · with Tate Kuerbis
+0.044better than expected — took 57% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2023-02-11 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Rickson
+0.039better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-01-21 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Potter
+0.052better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-04-17 · IRV-Seidl · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Seidl
0.063below expectation — took 20% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
John Doe / Surendranadh Movva
2022-03-06 · IRV-Seidl · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Beard
+0.042better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-02-27 · IRV-Seidl · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Hilber
0.045below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-02-26 · IRV-Gilbertson/Naffziger · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Austin
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 35% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.