Search

Paul Ecker

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
85 matches · 36W–49L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
204 of 357
OR · 3.0
340 of 600

Paul is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paul has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020202022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Paul has gone from the 66th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 51.5% of games
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 41.1% of games
2.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.9% of games
6.0mixed
30.3%
10W–23L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
W
Mazyar Afshar
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.036better than expected — took 72% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.026below expectation — took 28% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Bishnu Patra / Yogesh Patel
2026-06-13 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Doubleday
0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Prabhat Gupta / Nate Gallagher
2026-06-06 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mazyar Afshar
+0.032better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-05-29 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mazyar Afshar
+0.074better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Sigmund Nah / Scott Soot
2026-04-04 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mazyar Afshar
+0.044better than expected — took 60% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · IRV-Franck · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.033below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · IRV-Franck · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-23 · IRV-LaMontagne · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doug Cooke
+0.013better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Madison Martin / Benjamin Kelloggmixed
2025-11-22 · IRV-Lewis/Seidel 2 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Laidley
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · IRV-LaMontagne · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephen Doubleday
+0.025better than expected — took 39% of games against 33% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.