Search

Vincent Robertson

Happy Valley, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
33 matches · 10W–23L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
20%
stay 3.5
80%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 65% stay · 35% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.47. Lower than today’s 3.57 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Happy Valley · 3.5
2 of 7
OR · 3.5
26 of 735

Vincent is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams25 teams · 2006–2026
CAC-Lewis
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
CAC-VanLeuven
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
CAC-Morales
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
CAC-Deems
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2023
CAC-Olson
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2023
CAC-Lee
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Vincent has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.1% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 33.2% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 53.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-06-14 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Mickey
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Tracy
0.018below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Tracy
0.094below expectation — took 8% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Yang
0.037below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Adam Oken / Jonathan Hong
2024-03-16 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Yang
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2024-02-17 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wei Li
+0.013about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-02-11 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Yang
0.031below expectation — took 32% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2023-12-01 · CAC-Morales · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Yang
+0.015about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2023-10-15 · CAC-Morales · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Khamsouk
+0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-03-19 · CAC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Dunscomb
+0.053better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-03-18 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Lehman
0.031below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-03-12 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Lehman
+0.030better than expected — took 58% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.