← Search

Vincent Robertson

Happy Valley, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 10W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vincent Robertson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-06-14 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Mickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-16 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2024-02-17 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wei Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-02-11 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2023-12-01 · CAC-Morales · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-15 · CAC-Morales · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Khamsouk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-03-19 · CAC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Dunscomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-03-18 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Lehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-03-12 · CAC-Deems · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Lehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2006–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.1% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 33.2% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 53.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer