WHRC-Moreno

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.91 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86

Dave Cobban

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.74

Douglas Knudsen

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.70

Gregory Gonzalez

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.68

Tony Moreno

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.62

Parth Pandey

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.60

Patrick Maginnis

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 4

3.55

Jason Dortch

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.46

Neil Soiffer

usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.46

Rich Rice

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4

3.36

Bill Lowblad

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.24

Hyungje Woo

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Dave Cobban

52W–33L career

0%97%3%

3.86

Douglas Knudsen

5W–9L career

4%95%1%

3.74

Gregory Gonzalez

7W–13L career

12%85%3%

3.70

Tony Moreno

308W–152L career

2%98%0%

3.68

Parth Pandey

26W–32L career

9%91%0%

3.62

Patrick Maginnis

112W–54L career

13%87%0%

3.60

Jason Dortch

108W–99L career · type A

19%81%0%

3.55

Neil Soiffer

96W–138L career

44%56%0%

3.46

Rich Rice

65W–70L career

46%54%0%

3.46

3.5

Bill Lowblad

92W–61L career

0%95%5%

3.36

3.5

Hyungje Woo

79W–80L career

1%99%0%

3.24

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.