← Search

Randy Boose

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 43W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Randy Boose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-08-07 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Douglas Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with James Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Michael Gibbons / James Horen
2025-08-15 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Douglas Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-24 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-17 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-10 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Douglas Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-06-26 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-27 · IRV-Harris · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-05 · IRV-Harris · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Burkhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jim Gerber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Douglas Scott / Donald Shifrin
2024-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Jim Gerber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 66.2% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
24W–8L · 61.3% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova