Search

Kim Regalado

Tigard, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
40 matches · 17W–23L · seasons 20192026
Where Kim sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Kim is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kim has gone from the 66th to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 47.9% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Heinrichson
0.035below expectation — took 59% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Brown
+0.036better than expected — took 48% of games against 34% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-23 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Board
+0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Jones
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-02-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Richman
0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2023-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Atkins
0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
N/A
2023-06-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.121about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naomi Steinberg
+0.021better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judith Kobin
+0.010about as expected — took 32% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2023-03-26 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.062better than expected — took 80% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2023-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika Finrow
+0.024better than expected — took 100% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.