← Search

Amy Leahy

Lake Oswego, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 73W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Leahy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-07-06 · Leeding · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Leeding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · Leeding · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Leeding · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-23 · NOR-WHRC-Collie · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Leahy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · NOR-WHRC-Collie · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Leahy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7
W
2026-02-21 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-13 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Leeding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-01-04 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-11-22 · MAC-Parker · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-21 · MAC-Parker · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia McPhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-08 · MAC-Parker · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Devoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-19 · MAC-Parker · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elise Orban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2003–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
59.6%
28W–19L · 54.9% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova