Search

Cynthia McPhee

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
68 matches · 38W–30L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 4.0
82%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.10. Higher than today’s 4.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
61 of 119
OR · 4.5
122 of 226

Cynthia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams27 teams · 2014–2026
N OR-MAC-Duong
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
MAC-Parker
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women
2026
MAC-McPhee/Parker
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women
2025
MAC-Duong/Post
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2025
MAC-Duong/Bilstrom
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
N OR-MAC-Bilstrom
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cynthia has been 4.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Cynthia has gone from the 89th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.6% of games
4.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 53.7% of games
9.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
Mary Bullard / Emily Hagelgans
2026-02-21 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heidi Clark
+0.063better than expected — took 71% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Gregory
0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Wissmiller
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-01-04 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariniah Prendergast
0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-22 · MAC-Parker · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Handley
0.012about as expected — took 61% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-11-21 · MAC-Parker · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Leahy
0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-04 · MAC-Parker · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Clark
0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-20 · MAC-Duong/Post · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bo Johnson
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Alix Edwards / Hector M Salomonmixed
2025-07-13 · MAC-Duong/Post · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Nilsson
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-06-22 · MAC-Duong/Post · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bo Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-03-09 · MAC-Duong/Bilstrom · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Leahy
+0.042better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.