Search

Lisa Handley

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
73 matches · 41W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
96%
down to 4.0
4%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 80% down · 20% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.93. Higher than today’s 3.86 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
110 of 119
OR · 4.5
205 of 226

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams32 teams · 2013–2026
N OR-MAC-Duong
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
MAC-Parker
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women
2026
MAC-McPhee/Parker
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women
2025
SHC-Spitze
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
MAC-Duong/Bilstrom
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
N OR-MAC-Bilstrom
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 9.0, Lisa has gone from the 53rd to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.5% of games
4.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 61.4% of games
4.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.7% of games
9.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
N/A
2026-02-21 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.090about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-06 · N OR-MAC-Duong · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heidi Clark
+0.004about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-22 · MAC-Parker · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia McPhee
0.012about as expected — took 61% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-11-21 · MAC-Parker · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Clark
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · MAC-Parker · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Clark
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-08 · MAC-Parker · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Clark
0.033below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-10-19 · MAC-Parker · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Devoe
0.042below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-10-04 · MAC-Parker · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Leahy
0.014below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-04-19 · SHC-Spitze · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Solomon
0.002about as expected — took 39% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-04-12 · SHC-Spitze · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Leeding
0.027about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-03-09 · MAC-Duong/Bilstrom · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heidi Clark
0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-5
W
2025-03-02 · MAC-Duong/Bilstrom · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Burnett
+0.026better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.