Search

Coral Nash

Beaverton, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
108 matches · 39W–69L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
99%
down to 4.0
1%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 89% down · 11% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.90. Higher than today’s 3.81 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 4.5
18 of 19
OR · 4.5
214 of 226

Coral is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams51 teams · 2006–2026
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
SAC-Nash/Yu
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2024
THPRD-Feng 8.0
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Coral has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Coral has gone from the 45th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.7% of games
4.5
31%
22W–49L · 44.6% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history108 matches
L
2026-05-23 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.013better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
6-6
W
N/A
2026-05-09 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.109about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.003about as expected — took 39% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Spear
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.011below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.057below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1
W
2026-02-21 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristie Leake
+0.019better than expected — took 56% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kana Wakamatsu
+0.008about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-02 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-05-04 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.