Teams

SAC-Gatzke

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Feng Grove
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 4.5
4.03
Sydney Taggart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Deborah Puhl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Bo Yu
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Molly Odonnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Jian Xu
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Kim Tellin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Timothea Barnatan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Cathy Gatzke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.18
Shari Levelle
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Feng Grove
21W–13L career
1%99%0%
4.19
4.5
Sydney Taggart
68W–105L career
22%77%1%
4.03
4
Deborah Puhl
7W–4L career
not enough data
4
Bo Yu
105W–180L career
4%96%0%
3.65
4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
24%76%0%
3.53
4
Molly Odonnell
37W–90L career
37%63%0%
3.49
3.5
Jian Xu
138W–56L career
0%86%14%
3.48
3.5
Kim Tellin
110W–71L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Cathy Gatzke
53W–92L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Shari Levelle
63W–57L career
3%97%0%
3.18

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.