Search

Honghui Liang

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
145 matches · 61W–84L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
100%
down to 4.0
0%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 94% down · 6% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.88. Higher than today’s 3.78 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
117 of 119
OR · 4.5
223 of 226

Honghui is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams58 teams · 2012–2026
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
SAC-Yu/Tippisetti
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2025
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
SAC-Nash/Benedict
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
THPRD-Liang/Chen
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Honghui has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Honghui has gone from the 24th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
47.8%
43W–47L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
17.6%
3W–14L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history145 matches
L
Amanda Pruitt / Yvette Ly
2026-06-07 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Li
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Li
+0.011better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Li
0.005about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Andrea Cunningham / Jessica Ma
2026-05-03 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Li
+0.019better than expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Li
+0.012about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Li
+0.008better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Aman
0.032below expectation — took 55% of games against 66% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Feng Grove
0.033below expectation — took 53% of games against 65% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Aman
0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-17 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Benedict
0.037below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-02 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Valyrie Ingram
+0.010about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-06-14 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Benedict
0.109about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.