Search

James Kim

Edmonds, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
77 matches · 47W–30L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
62%
stay 4.0
38%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.90. Lower than today’s 3.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 4.0
1 of 9
WA · 4.0
20 of 782

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 2 down.

3.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, James has gone from the 55th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 70.4% of games
4.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.9% of games
9.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Sutter
+0.000below expectation — took 32% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Mike Wilson / Michele Ferreiramixed
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Sutter
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Crystal Vo
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Crystal Vo
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Charles Hodge / Ajay Qi
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryant Pham
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blake Garfield
+0.021better than expected — took 44% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Alexander Calpagiu / Tommy Wang
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Drake
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Mann
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Jablonski
+0.054better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Sid Sanyal / Nancy Chanmixed
2025-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Evans
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Jonathan Ip / Matthew Ip
2025-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blake Garfield
0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blake Garfield
+0.029about as expected — took 29% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.