← Search

James Kim

Edmonds, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 48W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-01 · NWW-HBSQ-Morrow · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Krystal Garfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Hoy · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Sutter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · HBSQ-Hoy · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Sutter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · NWW-HBSQ-Morrow · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Crystal Vo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · NWW-HBSQ-Morrow · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Crystal Vo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-06 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryant Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blake Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-19 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · HBSQ-Mann · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-17 · HBSQ-Mann · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Jablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-07-12 · HBSQ-Kim · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
Jonathan Ip / Matthew Ip
2025-05-04 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blake Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 70.4% of games
4.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert