Search

Rebecca Chen

KENMORE, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
128 matches · 80W–48L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.04
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
29%
down to 4.0
71%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 17% down · 83% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.07. Higher than today’s 4.04 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
221 of 364

Rebecca is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rebecca has played at 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

3.03.54.04.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Rebecca has gone from the 51st to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 68.1% of games
4.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 70.8% of games
4.5
46.3%
19W–22L · 50.1% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 52.5% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Boller
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Neal
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Merrie Vieco
+0.010better than expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Beth Berris / Elissa Burke
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Merrie Vieco
0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Skorupa
+0.006about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ali Siahpush
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laurie Ono
0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 4-4
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Gray
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Neal
+0.051better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Levine
+0.020about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Priscilla McAughan
0.051below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Crosetto
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.