← Search

Anca Popoaei

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
192 matches · 116W–76L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.58
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
16%
down to 3.5
84%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 10% down · 90% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.58 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 4.0
25 of 33
WA · 4.0
596 of 782

Anca is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Anca has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Anca has gone from the 26th to the 27th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 50.6% of games
3.5
70%
21W–9L · 57.3% of games
4.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
87%
20W–3L · 64% of games
7.0mixed
57.8%
26W–19L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history192 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihai Popoaei
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Frederik Christo Leopold / Dawn Spratleymixed
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihai Popoaei
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaci Pham
−0.038below expectation — took 37% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherry Liao
−0.016below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherry Liao
−0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Debra Born / Peyton Hume
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherry Liao
+0.080better than expected — took 86% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Illina Yang / Yao Chen
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Young
+0.004about as expected — took 32% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Lee
−0.017below expectation — took 55% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 5-6
L
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jutta Maas
+0.010about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Acuario
−0.025below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Dennis Fahey / Esther Nguyenmixed
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Filip Bedjovski
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sid Nagendran
+0.000better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.