← Search

Katie Pitt

Gig Harbor, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
56 matches · 18W–38L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.0
9 of 10
WA · 3.0
539 of 755

Katie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katie has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Katie has gone from the 20th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
32.4%
12W–25L · 44.3% of games
3.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 36.8% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy White
+0.021better than expected — took 100% of games against 75% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Maggie Gallagher / Alison Ambauen
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Coovert
+0.001about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy White
+0.042better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katrina Coovert
−0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doris Cruz
+0.018better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Rehberger
−0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kris Furrer
−0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Nicole Beck
2026-03-29 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Holien
−0.026below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Stacy Dilworth / Dominique Mansilla Hermann
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Seaholm
+0.049better than expected — took 92% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Seaholm
+0.024better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Seaholm
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.