Teams

Peters

2026 One Doubles-Winter · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Peters / Ellen Stagnone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-02vs Lisa/MollyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLacy Fehrenbach / Julie Peters vs Lindy Mense / Elena Belous3-6, 4-6
2026-04-20vs Artman-Dream TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Peters / Ellen Stagnone vs Leslie Artman / Theanne Sandbo1-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs Artman-Dream TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesLacy Fehrenbach / Julie Peters vs Leslie Artman / Bobbie Bailey6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLacy Fehrenbach / Julie Nierenberg vs Anne Bennett / Lisa Smith3-6, 2-6
2026-04-08vs Nielson-LCTA Jill & CoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Peters / Ellen Stagnone vs Jill Nielson / Lori Denton6-2, 6-2
2026-03-25vs Kim/Seay-Smash SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Nierenberg / Ellen Stagnone vs Violet Clerget / Marny Howell0-6, 2-6
2026-03-13vs KingLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Stagnone / Julie Peters vs Alison Ambauen / Laura King6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ellen Stagnone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Lacy Fehrenbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Julie Peters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Julie Nierenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Stagnone + Julie Peters161254% games+2.1% vs expected
Julie Peters + Lacy Fehrenbach4156% games+1.1% vs expected
Ellen Stagnone + Lacy Fehrenbach303 matchesnot enough data
Julie Nierenberg + Lacy Fehrenbach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ellen Stagnone
136W–120L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Lacy Fehrenbach
90W–63L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Julie Peters
87W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Julie Nierenberg
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.