Search

Kent Gavin

Auburn, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
125 matches · 70W–55L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 50 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
85%
stay 3.0
15%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Auburn · 3.0
8 of 9
WA · 3.0
396 of 755

Kent is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kent has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Kent has gone from the 54th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 78.2% of games
3.0
54.2%
32W–27L · 52.6% of games
6.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Kelly
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Munoz
0.040below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Munoz
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Lacy Fehrenbach / Michael Heelanmixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jaime Brucker
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Alex Christensen / Michael Devore
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Braden Cowan
+0.028better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jaime Brucker
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Brian Wald / Kevin Desmond
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Braden Cowan
0.021below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dallas Sloan
0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Aaron Artman / Christopher Bailey
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lupe Gonzales
+0.031better than expected — took 57% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-23 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.019below expectation — took 53% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Michael Harn / Jonathan Fischer
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dallas Sloan
0.008about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Shane Crook / Anne Bennettmixed
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Dymarkowski
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.