← Search

Kent Gavin

Auburn, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 74W–67L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Kent Gavin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-09-13 · JTC-Hewitt · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Steve Racine championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Lupe Gonzales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · Munoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicholas Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · JTC-Seeley/Filomeo-What The Deuce · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · Munoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Munoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · JTC-Seeley/Filomeo-What The Deuce · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jaime Brucker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · Munoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Munoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Munoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Braden Cowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-14 · JTC-Seeley/Filomeo-What The Deuce · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jaime Brucker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Munoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Braden Cowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · SWW-JTC-Mir Arenas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dallas Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 78.2% of games
3.0
48.6%
35W–37L · 50.1% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova