Search

Sarah McCarthy

Tacoma, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
125 matches · 77W–48L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 3.5
27 of 65
WA · 3.5
725 of 1209

Sarah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sarah has gone from the 21st to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.3% of games
3.0
65.5%
36W–19L · 55.5% of games
3.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 49.5% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Smith
+0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Smith
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Jaime Brucker / Maggie Horvat
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Smith
+0.010better than expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Smith
+0.018better than expected — took 54% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Chris Coovert / Jennifer Butlermixed
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colin Eng
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Bennett
0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Smith
+0.031better than expected — took 52% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Smith
+0.039better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
James Chan / Kathy Lokenmixed
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danny Herbst
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shane Crook
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ray
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Duenhoelter
+0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.