← Search

Maggie Horvat

BONNEY LAKE, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 33W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maggie Horvat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-07-01 · 6-PACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Brucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · 6-PACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tashi Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-06 · JTC-Pinyerd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maileen Walz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · JTC-Pinyerd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Brucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · JTC-Pinyerd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alyssa Simm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · JTC-Pinyerd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alyssa Simm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-08 · JTC-Schmidt/Dalrymple 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · JTC-Schmidt/Dalrymple 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellie Manary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · JTC-Schmidt/Dalrymple 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doris Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-01-11 · JTC-Schmidt/Dalrymple 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · JTC-Racine/Gonzales-Mixed Ballz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-09 · JTC-Racine/Gonzales-Mixed Ballz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 81.1% of games
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 75.9% of games
3.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 33.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#1 Singles
17%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer