← Search

Jennifer Foley

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
78 matches · 36W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.5
17 of 47
WA · 3.5
551 of 1209

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennifer has gone from the 54th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
59.2%
29W–20L · 51.8% of games
4.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 40.4% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Shanley
−0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Goerig
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Guptill
+0.047better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Brazel
+0.028better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
KuiCha Davison / Kathy Loken
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Brazel
−0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · with Mary Guptill
+0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Kye Paik / Mary Sheryll Tanchamps
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · with Kelley Hunter
+0.004about as expected — took 39% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Briana Slater / Tricia DeFelice
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Hunter
−0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Hunter
+0.040better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Guptill
−0.011below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Rebecca Racine / Maggie Horvat
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaylee Wagner
−0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.