Teams

Spin City Summer 26

2026 One Doubles-Summer · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs The Summer SixLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Brazel / Barbara Lucenko vs Susanna Buttorff / YongA Hassig3-6, 3-6
2026-07-26vs Team BlueWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrianna Arboine / Violet Clerget vs Clara Harig / Laila Bush6-3, 6-3
2026-07-21vs TheOnesLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Sipe / Holly Brazel vs Wendy Clarke / Melissa Heckman0-6, 4-6
2026-07-19vs Spin SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrianna Arboine / Lacy Fehrenbach vs Anna Howard / Corinne Smith2-6, 3-6
2026-07-17vs NeeleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Brazel / Lacy Fehrenbach vs Lori Neeley / Erika Sagle3-6, 3-6
2026-07-12vs Delaney-HunterWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Sipe / Violet Clerget vs Jill Delaney / Mary Ellen Jones6-4, 6-3
2026-07-12vs Babolati HottiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrianna Arboine / Barbara Lucenko vs Nicki Kristol / Jillian Strayer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-20vs SlaterWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Lucenko / Brianna Arboine vs Briana Slater / Kristen Taylor6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Christina Sipe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Brianna Arboine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Lucenko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Holly Brazel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Violet Clerget
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Lacy Fehrenbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Lucenko + Brianna Arboine6066% games+14.9% vs expected
Violet Clerget + Brianna Arboine4253% games+6.5% vs expected
Lacy Fehrenbach + Christina Sipe8359% games+4.7% vs expected
Violet Clerget + Holly Brazel12954% games−0.2% vs expected
Holly Brazel + Barbara Lucenko5447% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Sipe
85W–79L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Brianna Arboine
47W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Barbara Lucenko
62W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Holly Brazel
64W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Violet Clerget
160W–130L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Lacy Fehrenbach
90W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.