← Search

David Earl

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 101W–89L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Earl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with David Williams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · GTC-Chan-*Flying Eagles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Boczar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-21 · GTC-Chan-*Flying Eagles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Loreal ARGYLE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · SWW-VAC-Peters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · KTAC-Bella-Full Moon Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Maxfields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · SWW-VAC-Peters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Salinas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-24 · KTAC-Bella-Full Moon Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liam Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-30 · SWW-VAC-Peters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Salinas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-04-19 · KTAC-Bella-Full Moon Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Maxfields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · SWW-STAC-Wallace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-04 · SWW-STAC-Wallace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zach Havekost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · SWW-STAC-Wallace · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.8%
49W–29L · 53.8% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
63%
29W–17L · 55.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
56 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert