← Search

Becka Parker

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
48 matches · 29W–19L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
66%
stay 3.5
34%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 91% stay · 9% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.39. Lower than today’s 3.47 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.5
3 of 47
WA · 3.5
137 of 1209

Becka is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Becka has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Becka has gone from the 73rd to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
62.2%
28W–17L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
Kelly Barrett / Caroline Thompson
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Duerfeldt
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Moody
+0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlet Herrick
+0.075better than expected — took 75% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Lucenko
+0.011about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Cindy Stoneback / Tricia DeFelice
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Roy
−0.019below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shellee Grim
+0.000about as expected — took 68% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Moody
−0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Duerfeldt
+0.017better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Caroline Thompson / Breanne Sayah
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marny Howell
+0.017better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlet Herrick
−0.014below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kathy Loken / Diana Chan
2026-04-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Moody
−0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Moody
−0.017below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.