Search

Julie Wong

Gig Harbor, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
93 matches · 47W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.23
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.5
6 of 14
WA · 3.5
771 of 1209

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Julie has gone from the 69th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
50.6%
40W–39L · 49.4% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Qi
+0.048better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Sutton
0.018about as expected — took 60% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Mills
0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kye Paik
0.013about as expected — took 62% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Mills
+0.017better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Mills
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Mills
+0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Christine Peregrin / Sheila Ryan
2025-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dania Massry
0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dania Massry
0.015below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.