Teams

Racquet come back

2026 One Doubles-Summer · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-15vs Allen KnightWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlet Herrick / Karen Abbott vs Leah Knight / Noel Abrams5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-15vs Eastern SpinLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Abbott / Joyce Duerfeldt vs Maileen Walz / Hwayoung Srein7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-08vs Thompson/BarrettWon 10
W#1 DoublesBecka Parker / Joyce Duerfeldt vs Kelly Barrett / Caroline Thompson6-2, 6-1
2026-07-07vs Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMBLost 01
L#1 DoublesBecka Parker / Debra Moody vs Tamara Rosenbloom / Megan Dempsey6-7, 2-6
2026-06-28vs Serving You A-WynWon 10
W#1 DoublesBecka Parker / Charlet Herrick vs Alyssa Simm / Alexandrea Norris6-1, 6-3
2026-06-17vs Fab 4Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Moody / Karen Abbott vs Dana Manke / Amy Marlow2-6, 1-6
2026-06-10vs Tan-TerminettersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Moody / Joyce Duerfeldt vs Clare Cadiz / HA NGUYEN2-6, 1-6
2026-06-08vs Doubles Trouble SummerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharlet Herrick / Karen Abbott vs Jill Shanda / Chun Saul1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Becka Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Charlet Herrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Debra Moody
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Joyce Duerfeldt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Karen Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlet Herrick + Becka Parker4355% games+9.0% vs expected
Debra Moody + Becka Parker4649% games+3.4% vs expected
Becka Parker + Joyce Duerfeldt6351% games−0.8% vs expected
Charlet Herrick + Debra Moody61243% games−1.9% vs expected
Debra Moody + Joyce Duerfeldt161451% games−3.0% vs expected
Charlet Herrick + Karen Abbott183943% games−3.3% vs expected
Debra Moody + Karen Abbott3346% games−3.6% vs expected
Charlet Herrick + Joyce Duerfeldt3644% games−5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becka Parker
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Charlet Herrick
61W–125L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Debra Moody
71W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Joyce Duerfeldt
66W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Karen Abbott
76W–108L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.