Teams

Doubles Trouble Summer

2026 One Doubles-Summer · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-29vs Fab 4Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNikki Dizon / Cristina Stormans vs Jessica Corddry / Amy Marlow6-7, 4-6
2026-07-28vs Allen KnightWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Peebles / Cristina Stormans vs Leah Knight / Katherine Steuart6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-27vs Eastern SpinWon 10
W#1 DoublesNikki Dizon / Jill Shanda vs Sachiko Urano / Hwayoung Srein6-1, 6-1
2026-07-19vs Serving You A-WynWon 10
W#1 DoublesChun Saul / Nikki Dizon vs Wynstan Larsen / Alexandrea Norris2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-14vs Tan-TerminettersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Peebles / Chun Saul vs Mary Sheryll Tan / Kye Paik1-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs Thompson/BarrettLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Shanda / Cristina Stormans vs Kelly Barrett / Breanne Sayah3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-08vs Racquet come backWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Shanda / Chun Saul vs Charlet Herrick / Karen Abbott6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Carol Peebles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Chun Saul
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Jill Shanda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Nikki Dizon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Cristina Stormans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Shanda + Chun Saul7259% games+7.9% vs expected
Jill Shanda + Nikki Dizon7261% games+5.4% vs expected
Carol Peebles + Chun Saul5157% games+5.1% vs expected
Jill Shanda + Carol Peebles22858% games+3.6% vs expected
Carol Peebles + Cristina Stormans6452% games+3.0% vs expected
Nikki Dizon + Carol Peebles13554% games+2.6% vs expected
Nikki Dizon + Cristina Stormans6450% games−2.1% vs expected
Jill Shanda + Cristina Stormans3254% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Peebles
138W–102L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Chun Saul
148W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jill Shanda
121W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Nikki Dizon
97W–118L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cristina Stormans
44W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.