Search

Margaret Tucker

Tacoma, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
69 matches · 28W–41L · seasons 20192026
Where Margaret sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Margaret is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Margaret has gone from the 30th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.8% of games
3.5
28.6%
12W–30L · 43.4% of games
6.0
70%
7W–3L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
Jeanne Cubanski / Karen McPhee
2026-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisha Davis
0.039below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisha Davis
+0.014better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Holbrook
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Holbrook
0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 4-5
L
2025-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Holbrook
0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisha Davis
0.031below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annamarie Larson
0.058below expectation — took 35% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisha Davis
+0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Neeley
0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Kwok
0.012below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annamarie Larson
+0.047better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Holbrook
+0.027better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.