Search

Kiera Kim

Kenmore, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
58 matches · 34W–24L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kenmore · 3.5
6 of 9
WA · 3.5
865 of 1364

Kiera is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kiera has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Kiera has gone from the 25th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 61.5% of games
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 60.9% of games
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 55.1% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.9% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Ikeda
0.032below expectation — took 40% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Jamie Schroeder / Jennifer Combs
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Jones
+0.012about as expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Thompson
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Ikeda
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Bridget Haba / Stacey Terrien
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Ikeda
+0.065better than expected — took 86% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Michael Qi / Eileen Lumixed
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Cao
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Vera Choi / Pat Nevinmixed
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ximeng Jia
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Janine Francisco / Mitch Franciscomixed
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Lam
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Ebisu
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Benjamin Kelch / Deanna Ellmermixed
2025-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Chan
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-09-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lam Nguyen
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Coghlan
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.