Teams

TCSP-Cougars Fall 2025-Smith

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-16vs WSC-Full Metal Rackets-HummerLost 12
L#1 DoublesTim Smith / Gregory Malley vs Peter Sefton / Puru Masuli3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Brown / Brian Kelly vs Steve Eggerman / Craig Lawson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Aalfs / Michael Ford vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-18vs CP-EnsingWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Kelly / Matthew Day vs Xiadong Gong / Stephen Meyles6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Smith / Gregory Malley vs Mike Brennen / Scott Reynolds6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRandy Woo / Jonathan Brown vs Bob Isaacson / Justin VonGortler1-6, 6-7
2025-10-12vs BC-M 7.0-SeeleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Smith / Gregory Malley vs Juan Vegarra / Matthew Scher7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRandy Woo / Brian Kelly vs Paul Snyder / Bruce Seeley3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDan Holland / Bruce James vs Chris Nelson / C Todd Rentschler6-1, 6-3
2025-10-05vs HBSQ-Hammers-PolettiLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Day / Dan Holland vs Kenny Kramer / Paul Lorring7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Lennard / Jonathan Brown vs Bruce Adee / Max Genereaux6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMatthew Aalfs / Michael Ford vs Scott Schlumberger / Willem Mager3-6, 0-6
2025-09-27vs EDG-Golden Grand Slammers-KellerWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Kelly / Matthew Day vs Bing Li / Barry Strand2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDan Holland / Tim Smith vs Bradford Gliner / Brian Dickson7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGregory Malley / Michael Ford vs Jack Young / Gary Nevins6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-19vs PSC-SunLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Day / Scott Lennard vs Mihai Petriuc / Matt Neerincx6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTim Smith / Randy Woo vs Zhidong Yang / Yue Zhao4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurent Bellange / Matthew Aalfs vs Warren Yasutake / Joe Zhou2-6, 1-6
2025-09-12vs MI-The Islanders-BoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Holland / Jonathan Brown vs Bernard Hensey / Daniel Nordale4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Kelly / Randy Woo vs Dean Wilson / Dean Martin1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGregory Malley / Matthew Aalfs vs Brian Selby / Geoff Lieberman7-6, 6-4
2025-09-06vs WSC-Full Metal Rackets-HummerLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Holland / Gregory Malley vs Puru Masuli / David Higginbotham2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Ford / Matthew Day vs Tom Fox / Jonathan Hummer4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJonathan Brown / Scott Lennard vs Chris Bennett / Ray Hisayasu6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Matthew Day
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.19
Scott Lennard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Dan Holland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Gregory Malley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Jonathan Brown
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Brian Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Laurent Bellange
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Bruce James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Randy Woo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Matthew Aalfs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Michael Ford
published
Tim Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Day + Scott Lennard6256% games+10.2% vs expected
Brian Kelly + Randy Woo1440% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Brown + Randy Woo224 matchesnot enough data
Dan Holland + Scott Lennard224 matchesnot enough data
Tim Smith + Scott Lennard404 matchesnot enough data
Dan Holland + Matthew Day303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matthew Day
113W–75L career · 8 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Scott Lennard
28W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Dan Holland
68W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Gregory Malley
19W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Jonathan Brown
61W–84L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Brian Kelly
57W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Laurent Bellange
6W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Bruce James
76W–92L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Randy Woo
34W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Matthew Aalfs
19W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Michael Ford
16W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Smith
36W–39L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.