Search

Daniel Nickel

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
69 matches · 41W–28L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
42 of 186
WA · 4.0
163 of 782

Daniel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daniel has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Daniel has gone from the 28th to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
67.3%
33W–16L · 54.9% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Isarankura
0.013below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
+0.033better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Day
0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilmot Li
0.013below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-03-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
0.034below expectation — took 59% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Peter Bui / Dennis Hanson
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
0.022below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Anh Tuan Hoang / Binh Nguyen
2025-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
+0.010better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Whaley
0.041below expectation — took 63% of games against 74% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Parrish
+0.061better than expected — took 71% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Marc Reguera / Karl Crabs
2025-01-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Greene
0.029below expectation — took 63% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Hank Chin / Justin Craciunoiu
2024-03-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Gipson
+0.011about as expected — took 54% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.