← Search

Laine Meadows

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 44W–59L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Laine Meadows to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-01-10 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-04 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-28 · Meadows · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-5
L
2025-11-23 · Meadows · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-25 · Meadows · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-10-24 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecilia Moens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-19 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecilia Moens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-08 · Meadows · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-09-13 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-07 · Meadows · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-06 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriela Beisel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-3
L
2025-08-09 · Meadows · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.7% of games
3.5
35.3%
18W–33L · 44.3% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 51% of the time
#1 Singles
51%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams